
Cheshire East Council has published details of its highways repair programme for the financial year 2021/22.
Councillor Craig Browne, Chair of the Highways and Transport Committee said "Unfortunately, this year sees a 21% reduction (£3.9m) in the level of funding the council receives from the Department for Transport to repair and maintain the road network on its behalf.
"Whilst the reduction in government funding is disappointing, Cheshire East Council has attempted to make good the shortfall this year by investing £3m from its own capital budget - essentially your Council Tax."
Cllr Browne continued "Whilst the added investment from your Council Tax has helped, the table* above clearly shows a fall in investment in the highways network this year and this inevitably means that Cheshire East Highways will be able to repair and maintain fewer roads this year than last year. Nevertheless, I have been working hard to ensure that some of our local roads do make it onto this year's list."
Macclesfield Road and Knutsford Road (from the Brook Lane Roundabout to the Ward Boundary) in Alderley Edge have both scored highly being ranked 23rd and 25th on the list respectively.
Whilst in Wilmslow, Cumber Lane and Holly Road North have also scored highly being ranked 27th and 33rd on the list.
Cllr Browne said "There is a realistic expectation that repairs will be carried out on both routes and this should be confirmed in about 6 weeks time. London Road (between Heyes Lane and Macclesfield Road) is the next highest, ranked in 55th place."
Roads are assessed across the borough in line with the Dept for Transport's required criteria, which are: engineer/local councillor priority; road condition; number of defects per scheme; number of customer service requests (complaints) per scheme; claims per scheme; and scheme location.
Click here to view this year's list of assessed roads on page 3 (ranked in terms of score).
* 2020-21 2021-22
Central Government Funding 19,002,000 15,051,000
Council Investment Top Up 1,700,000 3,000,000
Budget 20,702,000 18,051,000
Comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.
That stretch of road has been very dangerous for anyone on two wheels for months now.
Perhaps when this ‘prioritising’ takes place, Craig would be willing to look further than the Alderley Edge border signs
Most of the roads around this part of Cheshire are not fit for purpose.
They're an absolute disgrace ..... they MUST be repaired ..... and repaired PROPERLY, not just some cheap filling-in that only last a couple of months, then it's back to massive potholes again.
So, why is it so bad in this part of Cheshire I ask ?
Thank you for your question. Firstly, may I take this opportunity to explain that the assessment of local roads for prioritisation is carried out by highways engineers (rather than by elected members) according to the following criteria, approved by the DfT:
- engineer/councillor recommendation (up to 40 points)
- road condition index (up to 100 points)
- number of defects per scheme (up to 100 points)
- number of customer service requests [complaints] (up to 20 points)
- number of [motorist] claims per scheme (up to 20 points)
- location of scheme (10 points for rural areas, 20 points for urban)
All schemes are then ranked according to their overall score (out of a total possible 300 points). Local Councillors can influence the first assessment criterion by highlighting specific issues within their own wards, but this accounts for a maximum of 40 points.
The roads you have highlighted above all fall outside the ward of Alderley Edge and as Chair of the Highways & Transport Committee it is not within my gift to influence their score or ranking; that is the role of the relevant Ward Councillor.
In order to assist residents in their understanding of how local roads are prioritised for repairs, I have published the detailed assessment criteria and scoring matrix to my twitter account at https://twitter.com/Craig_9320/status/1396482384837632000
As the Dept for Transport have this year reduced (by £3.9m or 21%) the level of funding awarded to Cheshire East Council for road repairs, there will inevitably be many more roads on the ranking list than can be repaired with the money available.
Kind regards,
Craig
I believe that outsourcing is one of the problems. I've had evidence that work was said to be carried out on one occasion and it had not been. Oh for the days when the direct labour force was out - literally in force.
Patching is not the answer to where roads need rebuilding either. Falls apart too quickly.
Our road past Gawsworth the A536 has been closed again for patching. One day's notice too. No note on diversion of the bus services either. Road closure website out of date as well.
In January, I took photos of shabby, weed strewn pavements in Chorley, plus a picture of the blocked drain near the Brook Lane roundabout and submitted a note to the Council. I have had 3, maybe 4 apologies for the delay in dealing with my issues and it's now almost June.
Surely, as a rate payer I deserve more than that!!
I find the whole thing absolutely pathetic that we live in one of the finest areas in the country, but yet have the worst roads imaginable.
Why Why Why ?
It's just not good enough hiding behind facts and figures and statistics.
We, the Ratepayers, should not have to put up with this nonsense any longer !
Stop spending £2.4.m on almost-useless things like the cycle path towards Wilmslow and concentrate on the items that REALLY matter ! (rant over)
I’m concerned that our elected reps seek to defend the position.
2 words Ringway Jacobs. They are taking us all for a ride (a very bumpy ride) . The blame for that appalling 15 year renewal of contract lies with the last Council...but Craig we must get something done. Sam Corcoran is a Car hater so we cannot rely on him. We are pinning our hopes on you to get something/ anything improved. (As others have said the patching machine is not fit for purpose.)
You may have noticed in recent days that both Macclesfield Road and Knutsford Road have been re-assessed and marked up ready for repair works to be carried out. As a reminder, there are three levels of repairs:
Level 1 - pothole filling (these repairs are intended to be temporary, pending Level 2 work)
Level 2 - carriageway patching (planing out the defective sections, re-cover and sealing)
Level 3 - full resurfacing (stripping back to the road bed and relaying with new surface)
The works proposed for Macclesfield Road and Knutsford Road are Level 2 (carriageway patching); similar works have been carried out over recent years on Moss Road, Moss Lane, Oakfield Road and at the entrance to Carlisle Street.
The replacement value of the highways asset (perhaps liability would be a more appropriate term) in Cheshire East is £6bn. This year's investment in our local road network by DfT is £15m and represents just a quarter of one percent of the value of the asset (0.0025).
To apply an analogy, I'd like to invite everyone to consider for a moment the value of their home and then multiply this by a factor of 0.0025 - if they could only spend this figure annually to cover heating, decorating, repairs and maintenance, gardening etc, how long would it be before this started to have a noticeable impact on the condition of their home?
I understand and share the frustration expressed by many of the commentators above. £15m certainly sounds like a lot of money and the Council can, must and will make efficiency savings where possible; however, for the DfT to expect us to maintain an asset with an annual investment of just a quarter of one percent of its value, isn't realistic.
Kind regards,
Craig
"It's widely known that since 2010" (Note that year, 2010), "English councils have had less money to spend. But that's just half the story. When you account for inflation.. ..some councils have had to cut some areas of their spending by half."
Now, Tony, ask yourself why 2010 is significant as the year these cuts, including cuts in the local authority road maintenance budget, started. I'll give you a clue: that was the year the Tories came to power. Since the Tories were again returned at the last election, one must surmise that these cuts are the will of the people.
So as I said, if you voted for austerity, fair enough. But please don't complain about the consequences.
In 2009 I can remember speaking to Chris Shields a Highways engineer from Ringway Jacob/CEC about the state of a couple of minor roads near Mobberley (he told me that the Highways budget was capped by the Government)..Gordon Brown and Labour as I recall. Perhaps you should take off your rose tinted specs Vince ;)
The Lib Dems didn't seem to have their ducks in a row and got nowhere.
A competent middle - ground option, which is what (in my opinion) the country needs, was not on offer. But without a PR voting system anyone in Trafford who is not a True Blue Tory is pretty much disenfranchised anyway.
Therein lies the problem. We can only vote for what’s on offer at the time.
A sensible, middle ground option would have walked it.... but there wasn’t one.
Likewise, a third option on the Brexit vote would have completely changed the outcome - the choice should have been In / Out / Reform.
The EU is an expensive, bureaucratic layer of political control. There is a great deal of dissent from most European countries about the way in which the EU Parliament conducts itself.
It needs to be reformed, brought back in line and made to serve the greater good of the European collective.
Regrettably that wasn’t an option and so, faced with a simple in / out choice, it’s no great surprise that the vote went the way it did.
I suspect that there will be others following in our stead.
There are more post-brexit problems in Britain than you can shake a stick at, mostly stemming from border controls now we have made ourselves a 3rd country, although the exclusion of Europeans to work in hospitality and picking crops on farms is killing those industries.
The pro brexit newspapers have lied that the border problems, and food shortages, steel and wood shortages (almost unobtainable by small businesses and twice the price if you can get it since brexit) is due to EU red tape – but we have left the EU, so that is clearly not correct. Any imagined EU red tape would be behind us now. The actuality is that EU membership short-circuited for us all sorts of red tape, as would any trade agreement with any country. That we have withdrawn from that agreement with the EU and now face border red tape is down to us, not them. We need to grow up and realise that actions have consequences. Not one anti-Brit new rule has been introduced by the EU since brexit. We did it to ourselves.
Another example of probably hundreds of thousands of issues we face post brexit – we were a partner in the EU developed GPS satellite navigation system. Our share of the investment would have been peanuts, but now we are going to build our own – estimated at £22 BILLION but almost certainly a lot more. There are hundreds of engineering, scientific, and medical projects like this we are nor excluded from.
The list of brexit woes is massive. Just think if that £22B plus had been available for those who lost out on education due the covid crisis instead of yet having to build yet another GPS system!
The bottom line is we are stronger together than apart, that you make progress in life by seeking alliances, and you fail by isolating yourself and turning your back. Especially in a globalised 21st century that many brexiters seem to fear and not understand. We live in a completely different world to that of the early 1970s and we should embrace it, not flee in paranoia from it looking backwards.
However, this is turning into a brexit debate which is far from the local roads issue, so I’ll leave it there.