Parish Council to move forward with parking proposals

To enable them to move forward with their proposals to address the car parking problem in the village Alderley Edge Parish Council has agreed to formally express an interest in taking over the management of South Street car park, Ryleys Lane car park and part of Chorley Hall playing field from Cheshire East Council.

They also voted unanimously at their meeting on Monday, 11th April, to prepare and submit outline planning applications for Heyes Lane allotments, Ryleys Lane car park and Chorley Hall playing field.

In January the Parish Council revealed their proposals, which they feel will provide the most cost‐ effective solutions to the parking problem.

Their recommended solution includes providing 44 car parking spaces at the Heyes Lane allotment site along with an access road to the Festival Hall, to relieve traffic pressures on Stamford and Talbot Roads. This will provide additional car parking space for the Festival Hall and Medical Centre and result in the loss of about 25% of the allotment space.

They also propose to create 100 parking spaces on the lower end of Chorley Hall Lane playing field for long stay car parking spaces which would take up 25% of the site. At South Street they have already changed it to short term parking only but plan to amend the charges so they match those in the neighbouring Parade car park, remove the 'Free After Three' scheme and introduce no returning within two hours.

At Ryleys Lane, which is currently free to use and does not have any formal parking spaces, the Parish Council propose to reconfigure it for short term parking creating 33-35 spaces and possibly another 16 if a second tier was added.

Councillor Craig Browne "Following the parking survey and review, which found in favour of the three locations, in order to move things forward the next stage in the process is to formally respond to Cheshire East expressing our interest, in principle at least in, in progressing the asset transfer of each of those sites.

"An expression of interest does not formally commit us to going ahead at this stage it just means that each of the three sites can be placed on Cheshire East's asset register in order that they can be considered in due course or as requested.Therefore I would like to propose that we do formally express an interest in those sites."

The next step in the process would be that the assets be added to a list and at some point come up for consideration by the Cabinet member and then the full Cabinet.

Councillor Geoff Hall commented "Any asset transfers have to be very carefully thought through with a plan as to how they will be managed, what the potential risks are and how we would manage those risks because I think that didn't happen with the transfer of the festival hall and the planning for the medical centre. This is obviously on a much smaller scale but none-the-less we are still nine unpaid part-timers."

He added "There is still further work to be done to make this asset work for us (festival hall) so we need to be clear but for myself I am quite happy to support the proposal."

Speaking about submitting outline planning applications, Councillor Craig Browne said "Following the parking survey and review which found in favour of the three locations, and in order to start to move things forward with the car parks we really need to be in a position where we can prepare and submit outline applications for each of the three sites so that Cheshire East planning has something concrete to work with us on and they have said that they will do that.

"On the strength of an outline application they will help us to get that to a point that it addresses any issues that it would need to address before we went all the way to a full application."

He added "It is likely that, as all three options contravene the National Planning Policy Framework, paragraph 74, as well Cheshire East's policy on public open space we will need to consider appropriate litigation measures which effectively means we will need to look at how and where we can provide better quality open space to mitigate what will be taken away. This is why I think it's important we go through the outline process first instead of spending larger sums of money.

"The cost of each outline application will be £192.50, it's normally £385 but as a parish council we get a 50% reduction."

Tags:
Alderley Edge Parish Council, Car Parking Review, Parking, Parking
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Bernard Pearce
Tuesday 12th April 2016 at 4:48 pm
I'm still having some difficulty in understanding why the economies of scale are being ignored! If 44 parking spaces would take up 25% of the Heyes Lane site, then it could accommodate 170 - 180 spaces - equal to all the proposed parking spaces in the 3 proposed locations!! Surely it would be more cost effective to create just one car park? Is there still a desire to protect the interests of the allotment holders - and for fear of asking once more - how many of the current allotment holders are Alderley residents?
Tam Byrne
Tuesday 12th April 2016 at 5:50 pm
Your confusing what was done with a proper survey though Bernard.

What we have seen so far is a lot of allotment mates trying to show their idea was best all along. Through a pathetic collection of assessments and a survey of a handful of people with inconclusive results.

Instead of tackling a problem of traffic and parking properly it seems these guys can only come up with Tarmac more places and make parking spaces.

Looks like everyone will have to tool up for a few protests and legal battles. Hopefully there will be more chance of a return or Tomfoolery at 34 than a car park ever going into CHL.
Duncan Herald
Tuesday 12th April 2016 at 7:01 pm
re Ryleys Lane

The proposed reconfiguration will provide 33-35 spaces (see above).
The present (inexpensive) status provides 45 (or more) spaces.
Clever stuff reconfiguration.

If a second tier is added, that will cost a large chunk of public money, for a further max. 16 spaces.
So much money is spent, to perhaps gain 6 spaces at most ( 45 v. 51 (35 + 16 = 51).

Why ? Be nice to see a costing.

The cheapest plan has always been to simply extend the existing space up to London Rd. Many extra spaces at very little cost.

Common sense versus entrenched minds.

Let me don my 'hat of prognostication' at this point. The end of free parking at Ryleys Lane.

Do you remember the 'Vicar of Dibley' ?