As the first anniversary of the drug drive law approaches Cheshire police are reminding all drivers that the drug drive laws do not just cover illegal drugs, but also includes a number of commonly prescribed medications, including: clonazepam, diazepam, flunitrazepam, lorazepam, methadone, morphine or opiate and opioid-based drugs, oxazepam and temazepam.
The law does not make it illegal to drive when taking the prescribed medications; it just means that the medication must be taken in accordance with the advice of a healthcare professional.
Superintendent Bev Raistrick said: "Whilst a person may have a defence in law to driving with a drug above prescribed limit they will not have a defence if they are impaired by the drug whilst driving. If anyone has any concerns about a medication they are taking they should consult their doctor first before getting behind the wheel.
"It's far better to speak to somebody about your concerns than face the prospect of a 12 month driving ban, a fine of up to £5000 and up to six months in prison. Even worse, if you are impaired then you could pose a serious risk to other road users."
Assistant Chief Constable Mark Roberts said: "Anyone who is thinking of driving under the influence should think twice before they drive into Cheshire. We have the highest conviction rate for drug driving in the whole of the North West, and one of the highest in the UK. So the chances are if you drive under the influence in Cheshire then you will be caught.
"Anyone who is caught drug driving faces a minimum 12 month driving ban, an unlimited fine, up to six months in prison and a criminal record, this could affect their job, their family and their livelihood."
Comments
Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.
Anyone noticed the police in the over parked streets of Alderley.
Obviously nobody drink drives!
I am a Homewatch co-ordinator and have been dismayed by the difference between the pre-Dwyer days, when I could quickly phone a local number to discuss problems and get a cop in a car to any incident and the current no-response situation; his recent self-promoting outpourings are remakable. Prior to his appointment I seem to recall that there were around 12-14 (expenses-only) folks on the committee who ran things. Now there are 14 full-time "assistants" plus his hefty salary (part-time, retired bloke) can be checked online!