Royal Oak development gets go ahead

DSC_3196

Full planning permission has been granted to Riverlodge Properties Ltd to replace the Royal Oak pub on Heyes Lane with four semi-detached and one detached dwelling.

A planning application (10/4529M) to build four semi detached and two detached houses was submitted in November 2010 and withdrawn earlier this year. It was then replaced with the application (11/1111M) which has just been passed -  the main difference being that plot 5, considered by some local residents to have an overbearing effect on neighbouring properties, had been removed.

The application from Stephen Price at Riverlodge Properties, who took over the lease as a family business in 2005, states that this plot will be the subject of a separate planning application.

The public house has been in existence for many years, but trade had declined dramatically in recent years and the business was no longer economically viable. The Royal Oak closed in April and is currently being demolished.

Conditions imposed upon this application state that prior to the commencement of the development a scheme for the landscaping of the site must be submitted and approved.

Also, no trees, shrubs or hedges within the site which are shown as being retained on the approved plans can be felled, uprooted, wilfully damaged, cut back in any way or removed without the prior written consent of the Local Planning Authority.

The conditions also forbid any development involving the use of external materials to commence until samples of the materials have been approved and no dwelling can be occupied until the access roads and footpaths leading to them have been constructed in accordance with the approved plans.

The planning application and Decision Notice, containing the full list of conditions, can be viewed on the Cheshire East planning portal by searching for planning reference 11/1111M.

Click here to read our earlier articles regarding plans for the Royal Oak pub.

Tags:
Planning Applications, Royal Oak
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Peter Bugler
Monday 27th June 2011 at 9:32 am
I am very sorry to see the Royal Oak go. With different owners and a sensible busness plan things would have been quite different. The village has lost an irreplacable amenity so that a developer can make a short term financial gain. What did our Councils and MP do to stop it - nothing. Are they going to change the rules/laws to stop it happening again? I doubt it.
Vin Sumner
Monday 27th June 2011 at 2:15 pm
I agree Peter ... seems like this was always the intention ... and another property gets demolished ... we must have the highest demolition rate in the country ... who holds such stats?
Duncan Herald
Monday 27th June 2011 at 5:05 pm
Peter...what your parish council did was to object...and the planners disregarded that.
Fiona Doorbar
Tuesday 28th June 2011 at 10:25 am
Where do you guys live in relation to what was the Oak I wonder ? You ask most Heyes Lane residents and they are 100% in favour of this new development.
It will be a big plus living near some high spec houses rather than an unused pub.
I can't wait to see the finished result . The plans looks great , thats why the planning commitee passed them.
Richard Downs
Tuesday 28th June 2011 at 6:33 pm
Absolutely Fiona,
As a resident of Heyes Lane and a publican I can say with a heavy heart that it was time for the pub to go.
The planning application was accepted because the plans were well thought through and will make use of an area which would otherwise remain derelict. Any serious objections were dealt with in the correct manner - I even remember seeing a conservation report about the newts which suddenly appeared there when the first application was submitted.
Helen Culwick
Wednesday 29th June 2011 at 10:32 pm
I agree with Peter. I'm constantly shocked at the approvals for 'change of use' for land and properties in this area. As business and leisure ameneties are replaced by housing we'll be left with a housing estate and nothing to do and nowhere to work.
Adrian Barber
Friday 1st July 2011 at 7:01 am
If you look at the facts nationally for public house closures and housing shortages I'd say that this is an unfortunate but unavoidable/inevitable outcome. Surely it's better to have some nice housing than a 4th supermarket or other large retail outlet which would further erode local business?

In an ideal world perhaps Waitrose could have ended up there and saved the diversity of the village centre a little but sadly this is not an ideal world and business cases have to work.