No more Yesterdays as housing plan gets approval

The days are numbered for a former nightclub building which has been vacant for the past 12 years and become an eyesore, having suffered from vandalism and neglect.

Members of the Northern Planning Committee have approved plans to demolish the Victoria villa, most recently used as Yesterdays nightclub but originally a small hotel, and replace it with a residential development.

MCR Property Group will replace it with 12 dwellings, 4 of which will be affordable units.

The proposal was identified as an inappropriate form of development, which is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt, but it was approved because there were deemed to be very special circumstances which outweigh the potential harm to the Green Belt.

The benefits include providing much needed affordable housing in Alderley Edge, making effective use of a previously developed site, removing the existing unsociable use of the nightclub and improving the appearance of the vacant site.

Councillor Craig Browne spoke at the Northern Planning Committee Meeting saying "An application of this kind is always likely to divide opinion, owing to the contemporary nature of its design. Although I'm not personally a fan of the design, I'm not going to speak against this proposal for the following reasons:

- the site has been derelict since 2004, when it was last used as a nightclub and is clearly in need of redevelopment;

- there has become a problem with anti-social behaviour, as youths congregate at the site during the hours of darkness;

- there is a need for more bungalows in Alderley Edge, to meet the needs of an ageing population (24% of residents are aged 65 years+);

- there is a desperate need for affordable housing provision, as currently young people who have grown up in the village are forced to leave on reaching adulthood;

- the revised plans show that the original proposal for a gated community has been removed (which is something the Parish Council had asked for).

"I am therefore prepared to issue a cautious welcome to the Officer's recommendation for approval of this application, subject to the inclusion of a condition ensuring that the development remains gate-free (which was agreed) and the inclusion of a condition ensuring that the properties designated as "affordable" remain so in perpetuity (which was also agreed)."

MCR Property Group, through an S106 legal agreement with Cheshire East Council, will provide £32,000 towards improving facilities at public open spaces in Alderley Edge.

The money will be used to purchase new play equipment for Alderley Edge Park, improved access to the playing fields, a multi-use games area and for drainage and access improvements at Chorley Hall Lane playing fields. There will also be a contribution towards improving access at Beech Close and Heyes Lane allotment sites.

Councillor Craig Browne also requested a further S106 agreement for a Toucan crossing on Wilmslow Road. The rationale for this request, which is supported by the Parish Council, is that there is no footpath on the eastern side of Wilmslow Road going south in the direction of Alderley Edge, until reaching Aldeli, which is half a mile away.

Cllr Browne said "For the development to be considered part of and connected with the community of Alderley Edge, it should be possible for eventual residents of the properties to be able to walk into the village safely. Currently, this would involve them having to cross Wilmslow Road at one of its busiest sections (as there is a footpath on the western side). It is also worth noting that such a crossing could also serve children accessing the Ryleys School Field and for this reason, this request has also been endorsed by Alderley Edge Parish Youth Council. (this request was delegated back to officers to negotiate with the developer of the site)."

Tags:
MCR Property Group, Yesterdays
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Duncan Herald
Friday 8th July 2016 at 9:36 am
Could just instal a new pavement where there isn't one i.e. over the railway, approx. between Heyes lane and the new restaurants? The Highways people said that such was perfectly possible, some years ago.
That might also have the advantage of slowing traffic coming into the village?
Duncan Herald
Friday 8th July 2016 at 9:53 am
Will the 12 dwellings all be bungalows or just the 4 affordable ones?

What price constitutes affordable in this context? Will there be some sort of 'sliding scale' i.e. the amount reduced depending on how long the applicant has been a resident of A.E.?
Will there be a rush for A.E. Passports?

Will it be sale or renting?

How will it be decided who will be offered the 4 affordable dwellings? Will there be some sort of Committee formed, to decide between applicants? Will the 'deserving poor' be interviewed?

This could run and run!

Of course I'm not against affordable housing but if there is a perceived need, why not ask the Parish Council to raise the monies and build some; that's not intended as humour by the way, as the monies were raised to build a Medical Centre. To paraphrase an old saying: 'come on boys and girls, we can put the show on right here'.
Lucy Allen
Sunday 10th July 2016 at 2:34 am
I've just had a great plan ! I think I will go around buying property that is on large plots of land even listed buildings ! Corden them off and wait 20 years for them to rot and have to be pulled down for obvious HEALTH AND SAFTY reasons ! Then guess what , no more listed building and I can just sell the land to developers!!!!!! HOW is this allowed to happen ?????? If you own a building that is listed you as a land lord/owner should keep up repairs , if this does not happen then it should automatically then be passed over to the national trust !!!!!!
David Hadfield
Sunday 10th July 2016 at 11:52 am
Be careful Lucy as you'll be told off by the English Language Thought Police people and their disapproval of the !!!!!!'s and ???????'s and more !!!!!!'s.
They review all comments placed on here as I know to my cost !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lucy Allen
Sunday 10th July 2016 at 3:18 pm
Yes David but it's not the fault of developers it's the land owners that allow this , which is very sad, the buildings should not be allowed to get in to states of disrepair in the first place !