Man trapped for two and half hours after bypass crash

bypass

Two people were trapped after a road traffic collision involving three vehicles on the Alderley Edge bypass near to Chelford Road.

Five people were involved in the crash which occurred at around 11.40pm on Sunday, 21st September. A blue Ford Fiesta was in collision with a red Mercedes and a white Seat Leon.

One fire engine from Wilmslow, one from Cheadle, and one from Wythenshawe attended the accident which left one casualty medically trapped and a second casualty physically trapped. Hydraulic cutting equipment was used to free the casualties who were handed into the care of paramedics.

The driver of the Mercedes was trapped in his car for approximately two and a half hours before being removed and taken to Wythenshaw hospital with suspected broken ankles.

The Alderley Edge bypass was closed for approximately six hours following the accident and two other people were also taken to hospital.

Police are asking anyone who may have witnessed the incident or any events leading up to it to call them on 101 quoting incident 1024 of the 21 September 2014.

Tags:
Alderley Edge Bypass
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

Comments

Here's what readers have had to say so far. Why not add your thoughts below.

Allan Lunt
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 3:38 pm
Read my earlier comments on upholding the 60mph speed limit on a two lane road.

I don't want to sound "smug" but I told you so, and this will continue to happen !

The road is treated as a "race-track".
Nick Jones
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 4:01 pm
Without making comment on the circs of this accident or previous fatalities, ... Its fair to say there has now been quite a few nasty prangs on this road since it opened. I dont have any official stats .....but .....In the day time its fine, but at night its poorly lit and a different kettle of fish....... as on more than one occasion .... cars have overtaken vehicles in the direction they are travelling, treating it like a dual carriageway.........then you're faced with an oncoming vehicle,...Is this a result of poor signage ? poor lighting ? or just bad driving ?
Maybe the local constabulary and HSE could review the road markings, lighting conditions to assist safe public usage ?.... food for thought.
Jon Williams
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 4:18 pm
Reduce the max speed to 50 and put double white lines under Brook Lane bridge, well thats what I would do !
Pete Taylor
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 5:40 pm
Reducing the speed limit by signs alone will have no effect; a set of average speed cameras would. It seems that Thursday evening is Ferrari evening, judging by by the screaming engines which can be heard from where I live (Fulshaw!).
Richard Bullock
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 5:55 pm
If you want the official stats: there have been 2 serious injury accidents (usually means where at least one person involved was admitted to hospital) and one fatal accident since the road opened in November 2010.

Serious injury accidents:
6th July 2011: car collided with another car whilst overtaking near to the roundabout at the Wilmslow end. Both drivers seriously injured.
18th November 2013: two bicycles collided head-on on the cycle path at the cycleway junction near the Brook Lane bridge. Both cyclists seriously injured.

One fatal accident - previously reported on this site:
16th September 2013: car skidded whilst going south at the Brook Lane bridge and hit another car. Driver and front seat passenger of one car seriously injured. Rear seat passenger killed. Driver of the other car seriously injured.

In all three cases, the accident occured in daylight.

Whilst two bad accidents involving cars is 2 too many - the accident record so far is quite a bit better than that of, say, the A34 south to Congleton.
Graham Jackson
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 6:02 pm
I'm not sure if the road has been designed this way, but it can be frustrating road to travel on. It appears that some users seems to have a different psychologically approach as to the intended speed it should be used at.

The road has short straights then almost immediately obscured by blind bends or dips.

It appears to frustrate and satisfy in equal measure.
Marc Asquith
Tuesday 23rd September 2014 at 10:37 pm
Can anyone bring up comparable stats with the A34 before the bypass was built ? Alderley village suffered a number of accidents as the traffic passed through.

It's important to do a counter-factual analysis... i.e. What if the bypass had not been built ?
Julie Worthington
Wednesday 24th September 2014 at 8:56 am
I sincerely hope that those involved in this accident make a speedy recovery but as for the speed set on this road please spare a thought for my father n brother who farm at Walton Farm who risk their life having to cross their livestock over that road as no bridge was made for them only one further down the way for the ramblers to cross !!! And my father is still waiting for the final payment of our land that was cut in half for this bypass !!!
Richard Bullock
Wednesday 24th September 2014 at 9:33 am
@MarkAsquith:

In the 3-years before the bypass opened - from 2008 to 2010 inclusive - there were 6 serious injury collisions and 3 fatal collisions on the former A34 (doesn't include any accidents on side roads where they were entering onto the A34 either).

I'll have a look for the accident record through Alderley & Nether Alderley since the bypass opened - although it'll take a bit of time as I've got to search through several different road numbers
Sarah Lane
Wednesday 24th September 2014 at 12:15 pm
Can you please just stop for a second and remember the passenger that was killed was a child and could have family reading this. The accidents might be statistics to some but they are a tragedy for the family and that should be remembered here.
Marc Asquith
Wednesday 24th September 2014 at 6:49 pm
Sarah - although everyone has considerable sympathy for the family of anyone injured or worse in any way whatsoever - the Council work on the sympathetically named KSI stats - Killed or Seriously Injured.

If members of the public think that a road is dangerous and want to lobby for measures to improve the safety of a road - the KSI stats are the starting point.

Since I was the Councillor who got this bypass built - in the face of opposition from AEPC - I take a keen interest in all matters surrounding it.
Sarah Lane
Wednesday 24th September 2014 at 7:32 pm
Well I think its in bad taste to discuss it in terms of KSI Stats on a public forum such as this.
Richard Bullock
Thursday 25th September 2014 at 12:39 pm
Sorry. I wasn't trying to cause distress. But it's difficult to have an objective view on a road safety matter without some regard to statistics. As Mark puts out, a council would certainly need to when considering whether to implement road safety measures - otherwise it risks spending its finite resources fixing a problem that doesn't exist on a relatively safe road, at the expense of leaving a dangerous road untouched. And what happens if the speed limit is reduced, as some have suggested, but this then causes more people to head through the village instead? Overall accidents could end up going up instead of down.

It might be worth pointing out that if the original predictions of traffic flow were more or less correct, then the bypass should have carried roughly 30 million vehicles by now - and at roughly 5km long, that's 150 million vehicle-km. It's unfortunate, but it's probably unrealistic to expect that not a single one of those drivers won't have made a mistake.
Jon Williams
Thursday 25th September 2014 at 2:49 pm
Richard, Why would reducing the maximum speed by 10mph cause more people to head through the village - as you put it ?
Richard Bullock
Thursday 25th September 2014 at 6:20 pm
@TrevorWilliams: The bypass offers a clear time advantage to those heading between Wilmslow and Congleton - whether at 50 or 60. But quite a bit of the bypass traffic isn't heading straight on at Monk's Heath.

For traffic heading between Wilmslow and Holmes Chapel, the bypass then turning right at Monk's Heath (or Bollington Lane) is longer than the Rileys Lane route - but actually not by much. In quiet conditions, if you're able to do most of the bypass at 60 - then it will probably take less time than the Rileys Lane route - but it's fairly marginal. At 50 on the bypass it'll be no contest - the Rileys Lane route will be quicker every time.

For traffic heading between Wilmslow and Macclesfield, the shorter route is through the centre of Alderley village, then over past the Wizard. But depending on which bit of Macclesfield you're heading to - it's likely to be slightly quicker to use the bypass at 60 and head up the A537 from Monk's Heath. If you're forced to go slower on the bypass, more traffic will divert back to the Wizard route and head up through the village.
Richard Fitzwilliam
Friday 26th September 2014 at 8:54 am
Richard, I understand your thoughts and I too take the alternative routes, especially off peak.
However, the route south you propose puts you past AESFG, a traffic clogging right turn to Ryleys Lane and then past Ryleys itself. Reducing traffic down this section, especially past the schools, was a primary reason for the bypass. Anything which increases traffic on this route would not gain favour.